| N.J. | Apr 20, 1923

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Savayze, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenfieimer, Ackeeson, Van Bitskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — Kone.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.