78 S.E. 156 | N.C. | 1913
Petition for partition of a certain tract of land of 50 acres in Henderson County, removed to and tried in McDowell County because of the disqualification of the clerk of the former county.
The clerk referred the cause to a referee, who heard the cause, reported the evidence, and found as a fact that partition cannot be made without serious injustice to the various and numerous owners, and that the interest of all parties will be greatly promoted by a sale of the entire tract for partition.
There are a large number of defendants, all of whom consent to a sale, except the heirs of W. t. Johnson, whose names are set out in their joint answer on pages 12 and 13 of the record.
These defendants duly excepted to the order of reference. They also excepted to the report of the referee, and demanded a jury trial (274) in these words: "that the question whether the said land can be actually divided or not be submitted to a jury."
Lyon, J., granted defendants' motion and directed that the cause be tried by a jury upon the issues raised by the pleadings.
Plaintiff excepts and appeals. It is needless to consider the question as to whether the joint answer of the heirs of W. T. Johnson raises an issue of fact, except as to whether the land is susceptible of actual partition without serious injury to the many owners. The answer certainly raises no issue of title.
These defendants in their exceptions to the referee's report have pointed out with particularity the only matter upon which they demand a jury trial, viz., as to whether the land can be actually divided. Having specified their issue in their exception to the referee's report, they are necessarily limited to that. Driller Co. v. Worth,
These defendants are not entitled to have that matter passed on by a jury, because that is not an issue, but only a question of fact to be determined first by the clerk and on appeal by the judge.
The clerk heard the cause and found the facts fully and ordered a sale. These defendants appealed to the judge. The judge held as a matter of law "that the answer of these defendants raises issues of fact which should be tried by a jury." In this he erred. *225
No issues of title or fact are raised except as to the feasibility of dividing the 50-acre tract of land among a large number of owners. This is only a question of fact.
In Ledbetter v. Pinner,
The order of Judge Lyon is set aside and the cause remanded, to be proceeded with in accordance with this opinion. The costs of this appeal will be taxed against the heirs of W. T. Johnson, whose names are set out in their answer.
Reversed.