Vanarsdale v. Richards

1 Whart. 408 | Pa. | 1836

Per Curiam.

The trust involved in this assignment, is peculiarly a subject of equitable cognizance; and though an actual want of chancery powers might compel us to sustain an action at law in the first instance, it does not follow, that a cestui que trust shall not be thrown on his equitable resources, where such have been provided for him. We consider the point to have been already decided.

Mr. Randall took nothing by his motion.