Van Winkle v. Steneck
122 N.J. Eq. 220
| N.J. | 1937We agree with the conclusions reached by the court below and the decree appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 14.
*Page 221For reversal — None.