History
  • No items yet
midpage
Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
304 N.Y. 590
NY
1952
Check Treatment

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. (Lutz v. Van Valkenburgh, 274 App. Div. 813), with costs in all courts. [See 304 N. Y. 95.]

Case Details

Case Name: Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 29, 1952
Citation: 304 N.Y. 590
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.