History
  • No items yet
midpage
Van Rensselaer v. Dole
1 Johns. Cas. 239
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1800
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

It was incumbent on the defendant to obtain a judge’s certificate to stay the proceedings, which is expressly required by the fourth rule of January, 1799. Not having done this, nor accounted for the neglect, we cannot interfere.

Rule denied.

N. B. The case was afterwards argued and decided on its merits, by consent of parties. ■

Case Details

Case Name: Van Rensselaer v. Dole
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1800
Citation: 1 Johns. Cas. 239
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.