History
  • No items yet
midpage
219 A.D.2d 811
N.Y. App. Div.
1995

Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted in part and third cause of action dismissed. Memorandum: A cause of action for fraud or misrepresentation must state in detail the circumstances constituting the wrong (CPLR 3016 [b]). A cause of action for fraud is not stated where the only fraud alleged relates to a breach of contract (Sparka Travel v Hamza, 182 AD2d 1067,1067-1068). Because plaintiff s third cause of action neither alleges a breach of a duty distinct from the contractual duty between the parties, nor states specific claims of fraud or misrepresentation, Supreme Court should have dismissed it (see, Edwil Indus. v Stroba Instruments Corp., 131 AD2d 425). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J. — Dismiss Cause of Action.) Present — Denman, P. J., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Van Neil v. Berger
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 29, 1995
Citations: 219 A.D.2d 811; 632 N.Y.S.2d 48; 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10832
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In