History
  • No items yet
midpage
Van Dyke v. Gardner
21 Misc. 542
City of New York Municipal Cou...
1897
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Under , the issues framed by the pleadings defendant could not show that the plaintiff was not the real party in- interest, as he failed to allege the facts necessary to' raise sutih an issue. i

The mere legal conclusion “that plaintiff was not the real or proper party in interest ” pleaded by him was not sufficient. Ho error being discovered, judgment affirmed, with costs. .

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Van Dyke v. Gardner
Court Name: City of New York Municipal Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1897
Citation: 21 Misc. 542
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.