Van Dyke v. Gardner
21 Misc. 542 | City of New York Municipal Court | 1897
Under , the issues framed by the pleadings defendant could not show that the plaintiff was not the real party in- interest, as he failed to allege the facts necessary to' raise sutih an issue. i
The mere legal conclusion “that plaintiff was not the real or proper party in interest ” pleaded by him was not sufficient. Ho error being discovered, judgment affirmed, with costs. .
Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.