History
  • No items yet
midpage
Van Deusen v. Newcomer
40 Mich. 525
Mich.
1879
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Tbe clerk has no authority to determine wbat deduction should be made on account of undue prolixity. It rests entirely with tbe court to determine whether such an abuse exists, and this will be done usually when tbe ease is disposed of. It is not always tbe fault of tbe appealing party that tbe record assumes undue proportions, and be should not be punished unless in fault. In tbe present case we were not satisfied there was any such fault in tbe plaintiff in error as to bring him within the rule, and we therefore did not, and shall not now impose any penalty, or make any deduction.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Van Deusen v. Newcomer
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 8, 1879
Citation: 40 Mich. 525
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.