History
  • No items yet
midpage
Van Aalten v. Mack
9 A.D.2d 648
N.Y. App. Div.
1959
Check Treatment

Order granting plaintiff’s motion to discontinue stockholders’ derivative action, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs to any party. Since the proceedings in this action had never developed intensively, discretion warrants the granting of permission to plaintiffs to voluntarily discontinue the action, albeit with prejudice to the particular plaintiffs. In a proper case, however, in which the proceedings were more extensively developed, the court not only has the power, but might well exercise it, to require a further condition to voluntary discontinuance. Thus, in order to give harassed defendants, if that be *649the case, the effect of res judicata as to all stockholders, the court could require appropriate notice to be given to all stockholders with opportunity to intervene and carry on the prosecution of the action before granting the discontinuance to the particular plaintiffs. (See Rules of Civ. Prae., rule 301, subd. 2.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Yalente and Stevens, JJ. [17 Misc 2d 828.]

Case Details

Case Name: Van Aalten v. Mack
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 6, 1959
Citation: 9 A.D.2d 648
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.