Valenzuela v. State

Nov 29, 2001
No. SC00-1843
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Anstead
PER CURIAM.

We have for review Valenzuela v. State, 764 So.2d 777, 777 (Fla. 1st DCA ‍​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‍2000), a per curiam decision of the First District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority the Third District Court of Ap*707peal’s decision in Bover v. State, 732 ‍​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‍So.2d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), quashed, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla.2001). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981).

In accordance with our opinion in Bover ‍​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‍v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla.2001), we quash the First District’s decision and remand this case to the First District for consideration in light of our recent ‍​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‍decisions in Bover and Carter v. State, 786 So.2d 1173, 1180-81 (Fla.2001). In remanding this case, we express no opinion as to the merits of Valenzuela’s rule 3.800(a) claim.

It is ‍​​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‍so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.