57 Iowa 179 | Iowa | 1881
I. The petition alleges that plaintiff, under a contract with Rawson, furnished lumber for constructing a one-
Judgment was rendered against Rawson by default. The defendants, Whitmore and wife, answered the petition, denying its allegations and alleging that Whitmore is the owner of the premises, and that they were never owned by Rawson. Whitmore appeals.
The testimony shows that plaintiff filed in the office of the clerk of the District Court the following statement and claim for a- lien:
“State of Iowa, Guthrie Comity, ss:
“I, William Valentine, first being, duly sworn, depose and say that I, on the — day of — 1877, made a contract with William Rawson to fnrnish material for a certain dwelling house and fencing, situated upon the following described land, of which the said W illiam Rawson was then and is now the owner of in fee simple, under contract of purchase, to-wit:
“South half of northwest quarter of section twenty-three (23), township seventy-eight (78), north range thirty-two (32), west 5th P. M., Iowa. That under and by virtue of said contract the said William Valentine furnished materials for said building, etc., as specified, and two several promissory notes were given by the said William Rawson to the affiant, as fed-lows: one for $77.41, dated July 4, 1877; one for $106.58, dated January 18, 1878; at the respective dates, at and for the usual prices charged for such lumber material.
“And that said account is a just and true account for the materials furnished by said William Valentine, and that there is due and owing him thereon, after allowing all credits, the sum of one hundred and eighty-three dollars and ninety-nine
“[Signed] William Yalentine.
“ Subscribed and sworn to by William Yalentine before me this 16th of 1879.
L. P. Hammond.
“Notary Public in and for Guthrie county, Iowa.
“Filed- January 16, 1879. W. H. Curtis, Clerk.”
The paper filed by plaintiff fails to comply with this provision, in that it does not show when the lumber was furnished, and does not contain a “statement or account ” of the demand due plaintiff. The simple statement that a sum is due plaintiff, for which promissory notes were given, is not the statement or account required by the statute. It should show the account whereon the demand is founded.
The statement in the paper filed that plaintiffs in the year 1877 entered into a contract to furnish materials does not tend to show when-they were furnished.
The plaintiff should show by his claim that he is entitled to a lien, which depends upon the nature of his demand and the time when it accrued; these should therefore appear. We conclude that the law has not been so far complied with as to give plaintiff a lien.
Reversed.