History
  • No items yet
midpage
Valentin Escobedo v. State of Indiana
989 N.E.2d 1248
Ind.
2013
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 A TTORNEY FOR A PPELLANT A TTORNEYS FOR A PPELLEE Jeffrey L. Sanford Gregory F. Zoeller South Bend, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana

Angela N. Sanchez Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana ______________________________________________________________________________

In the

Indiana Supreme Court _________________________________ No. 71S03-1306-CR-455 V ALENTIN E SCOBEDO , Appellant (Defendant), v.

S TATE OF I NDIANA , Appellee (Plaintiff) . _________________________________

Appeal from the St. Joseph Superior Court, No. 71D01-0812-FA-49

The Honorable Jane Woodward Miller, Judge _________________________________ On Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 71A03-1202-CR-60

_________________________________

June 28, 2013

Dickson, Chief Justice.

Sentenced to an aggregate term of fifty-three years upon convictions for Battery, a class A felony, and Neglect of a Dependent as a class D felony, the defendant appealed asserting claims of error in the trial court's evidentiary rulings and seeking appellate sentence review and revision under Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B). The Court of Appeals affirmed. Escobedo v. State, 987 N.E.2d 103 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013). We now grant transfer to address a single point. In rejecting the defendant's request for appellate sentence revision, the Court of Appeals summarized its analysis as follows: "In other words, the maximum sentence here can be justified *2 as a deontological response giving voice to a community's outrage, based on the facts and cir- cumstances of the crime." Id. at 120. We disagree and disapprove of consideration of a commu- nity's outrage in the determination or review of a criminal sentence. Notwithstanding this refer- ence, however, we agree with the ultimate conclusion of the Court of Appeals that the sentence imposed by the trial court is appropriate and should be affirmed.

In all other respects we summarily affirm the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Indiana Appellate Rule 58(A)(2).

Rucker, David, Massa, and Rush, JJ., concur.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Valentin Escobedo v. State of Indiana
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 28, 2013
Citation: 989 N.E.2d 1248
Docket Number: 71S03-1306-CR-455
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In