Valdez v. Consolidated Property & Casualty, 762 So. 2d 1034

PER CURIAM.

Valdez appeals a final judgment voiding his insurance policy. For the following reasons, we affirm.

The insurance .policy contained a valid provision voiding the policy upon intentional concealment or misrepresentation by the insured. See Wong Ken v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 685 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (clause which voids coverage for intentional misrepresentation is valid and enforceable). The jury found that Valdez violated that provision. Therefore, the trial court properly voided the insurance policy.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Valdez v. Consolidated Property & Casualty

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jul 26, 2000

Citations: 762 So. 2d 1034; 2000 WL 1021971; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9406; No. 3D99-2353

Docket Number: No. 3D99-2353

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.