midpage

V. T. v. Shrigi, Inc.V. T. v. Shrigi, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2026
1:26-cv-02415
Reporters:

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF‘S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS (ECF No. 24)

Having considered Plaintiff‘s second motion for extension of time to effect service of process (ECF No. 24), the court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff an extension of time to effect service because (1) Plaintiff‘s statute of limitations is approaching, and (2) Plaintiff has acted diligently to effect service upon Defendants to date.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

  1. Plaintiff‘s second motion for extension of time to effect service of process is granted; and
  2. Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days from the date of this order to effect service of process on the remaining eight defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 2, 2026

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case Details

Case Name: V.T. v. Shrigi, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Oct 2, 2026
Citation: 1:26-cv-02415
Docket Number: 1:26-cv-02415
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.
Log In