USA v. ArringtonUSA v. Arrington
MEMORANDUM*
Alex William Arrington appeals from the district court‘s judgment and challenges the 42-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of
Moreover, contrary to Arrington‘s argument, the facts on which the district court relied in imposing the upward variance were supported by the record and amply justified the court‘s conclusion that an above-Guidelines sentence was warranted given “the propensity for violence that punctuates [Arrington‘s] criminal history and his background [and] the violence that provides the context for the charges here.” The district court did not rely on any improper information in selecting the sentence, see United States v. Vanderwerfhorst, 576 F.3d 929, 935-36 (9th Cir. 2009), and it adequately explained its reasons for the upward variance, see United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, the court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the above-Guidelines sentence, which is substantively reasonable in light of the
AFFIRMED.