U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo

292 U.S. 611 | SCOTUS | 1934

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flannagan, 263 U.S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, ante, p. 610. Mr. Ray Martin for appellants in Nos. 978, 979, and 980. Mr. Harold W. Fraser for appellant in No. 981.

Mr. U. G. Denman for appellants in No. 982. Messrs. Ralph W. Doty and Earl F. Boxell for appellees.

Case Details

Case Name: U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo

Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States

Date Published: May 28, 1934

Citation: 292 U.S. 611

Docket Number: No. 978; No. 979; No. 980; No. 981; No. 982

Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS