Case Information
*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
8/8/2025 URTHTECH LLC, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER ON APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL -against- AND DISCOVERY FILINGS 1:22-CV-6727 (PKC)(KHP) GOJO INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant .
KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:
Non-party Aziz Awad, who withdrew from this action with the filing of the First Amended Complaint in November 2022 (ECF. No. 38), has filed a motion to intervene (ECF No. 140), a letter request for appointment of pro bono counsel (ECF No. 146), and objections and responses to Defendant’s requests for production (ECF Nos. 152 -153). This Opinion and Order addresses the latter filings, not the motion to intervene (which will be addressed in a separate opinion).
Unlike in criminal cases, in civil cases, there is no requirement that courts supply
litigants with counsel.
Hodge v. Police Officers
,
In
Hodge
, the Second Circuit set forth the factors a court should consider in deciding
whether to grant an indigent litigant’s request for counsel.
the indigent’s ability to investigate the crucial facts, whether conflicting evidence
implicating the need for cross-examination will be the major proof presented to
the fact finder, the indigent’s ability to present the case, the complexity of the
legal issues[,] and any special reason in that case why appointment of counsel
would be more likely to lead to a just determination.
;
see also Cooper
,
efforts to obtain counsel). In considering these factors, district courts should neither apply
bright-line rules nor automatically deny the request for counsel until the application has
survived a dispositive motion.
See Hendricks v. Coughlin
,
Because Awad is not currently a party and has not been granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion is premature. Accordingly, it is denied without prejudice . The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 146. Further, as a general matter, responses to discovery requests should not be filed on the docket. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to stri ke Awad’s filings at ECF Nos. 152-153.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 8, 2025
New York, New York
KATHARINE H. PARKER United States Magistrate Judge
