Urquiaga v. State, 624 So. 2d 810

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Urquiaga appeals an order denying his motion to correct his sentence to conform to the sentencing judge’s oral pronouncements. After review of the sentencing transcript, we agree with appellant that the orally announced sentence called for two concurrent three-year mandatory minimum sentences, not consecutive mandatory minimum sentences. The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to correct the sentencing order ae-cordingly.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Case Details

Case Name: Urquiaga v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Sep 28, 1993

Citations: 624 So. 2d 810; 1993 WL 392483; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9747; Nos. 93-769, 92-1156

Docket Number: Nos. 93-769, 92-1156

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.