History
  • No items yet
midpage
Uran v. Houdlette
36 Me. 15
Me.
1853
Check Treatment
Howard, J.—

The note of the defendant Was merged and extinguished by the judgment. That having been rendered Upon the note, after he had filed his petition for a discharge in bankruptcy, it constitutes a debt, originating at the time, and was not provable under the commission. Consequently the discharge was no bar to the judgment, and furnishes no defence to this action. Holbrook v. Foss, 27 Maine, 441; Pike v. McDonald, 32 Maine, 418.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Shepley. C. J., and Tenney and Appleton, J. J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Uran v. Houdlette
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1853
Citation: 36 Me. 15
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.