History
  • No items yet
midpage
Uptain v. State
20 Ala. App. 111
Ala. Ct. App.
1924
Check Treatment

There are no sufficient exceptions to the rulings of the trial court to present any question to this court for consideration and review save the ruling of the court in denying the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The evidence offered on this motion, while material, was merely cumulative, and as such would not justify the trial court in setting aside the verdict of the jury nor authorize this court in reversing the case. Grissett v. State, 18 Ala. App. 675,94 So. 271.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Uptain v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 3, 1924
Citation: 20 Ala. App. 111
Docket Number: 6 Div. 410.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.