Case Information
*1 ., q ~. n:.;x : OFFlCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS .j ..,,, ;‘:
AUSTIN ibnuary -la, 1939
., .:
Your rorp33t for cn a3 rsahxl bg t!d.f~ of- You c&z the follovdq
on cxt0a3loa of! c tern er caatandia: the ten ro- the hllld Jury to con- fleets that t!Ia -. tlnua its delibe
1 f3tatutca, Um, and Al-Mole , pg. iX.3431, 4ra tb stitdutas f t:ie District Cou?t. CO. ‘(c02~1~33~0n or ‘..’ * of tho p.Irtioular ccec on account of
not the exteneion of tic tern bpmr- ,320~ to authorize a Diotrict Sud,g to \ oscarf to dim030 of "oanding litigstionw. \ i
j *2 _ ..c /
? C’ Y\ /’ yo : .L ‘-,I. : ,.~ ,&OR Ln order to dis?oso of ">sndiag litigation* by otiltiw the
~CSUSO~ Par the OXIXXS~O~ to be Lo cllo-.v tke GrarC Pury to continue its deL,,~,cr~tions, To tLic ozdcr, tho corncats, quoted bolTp;l, of [23] - Judge 3nviLso!1 i?. V. state* 234 S.X. 644, sso epplicablo: dissczt* &nlon, in f2x3 ccne 0r AlOxr~~cr . . n* * * th3 ‘t&~ti03 if th0 ~ti’~sl0~ or the
ten under &-tic30 172G ortho Revised Civil Stat- utoo (Ann :rticle 19233) hzs no ‘ap.n3&xition. The ev',donco and the blSL escludou the idea that them 54s a ~om3.n.~ trial bcrcrc the cart zt tke t5.23 tb order \933 entcm?. TLc 0nlJ i043on m3 tbut t!~ Gr&d July raqcestod it, that they &$A bo enabled to dis?ooe of? 'so1p zxttcn they 'had uncer lnvest1~ution."
For thfj reasons statsd, we sra of the opi;lion th2t under : t& oircumstanoes, the'indictmld;s you mztion'are inmlkd.
Yours, rospectmy