Case Information
*1 OFFlCE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS AUSTIN
szana?eh10 Earal& 3QecraoLan
h68istaotCXvll Distrietnttonwy
Eall CJf Rooard8
Dalla8,%xaa
Dear sirs
letter of July 1010 5951, RO- iaw within whioh a y publlo wiy quality. In p"om latter and 8 l.n7v1784, but 4lffsrantly Geaersl 2. F. LooBey-, Zune County ikttornay 0r 5?ravia th8ZI El Citizen Of (1) Doea Ax-Mole SOSl, Revised Statutes, authorize a oounty am?k, before he raoeirea a oalanlssion from the Se- ar&my of Statd~ for a pizrty appalnted notary publia, to 'notify sal4 party to appear before him wIthin tea days, pay for his oomml~slon, and quality acraardfng to lm"?
(2) IX It does mt, is said party entitled lm rs- oeefte 8tmhmtfoed’te&la oaml8slanlma beenrewl~edbg the elerm
Bon. XarolU ::cCraaken, Faga 2
(3) If be ia, may he then qualify at any time
within ten daya frolz tho roaalpt of crush notioe? .uld
(4) If he my, are the sxaeptiom aontained in
said artlals available to him? ti -9 27, 1917, AttOTJley %Xl8rS3 ~OMY a~~I’O7Od
&UlfUl’0Zi00 O&loa No. 1777,in whloh the quo8tion8 subPELt?& by Hr. Romrby mre (Reports Of the AttOl’B0y fully amwW4d. General, 1916-19l8, p* 422) The opinion quotes Art.10108 6015 and 6016, Revbed Statute8 of 19ll. These art10108 vme brou@t forward in the Rwised Statutes of 1926, without mt- orlal #mnge8, a8 krtlole8 I5381 and SQSE feqmtimly, and they have not since been amended. Therefore, tf the uzmer8 found in Opinion ZZo! 1777 ware aorrsot then, they am oorreat now. X0 beliera that o~l.ni.an aorraotly OOmtTUw the statute8 involved and spgrova It. A oopy or whloh irr herowith onoloaed. three of the qnestians nbove steted, It It ctnswera the tirst doe.0 not answer the Sourth qU08tbn, is apparent that but it the exemptions OQX apj-Ap only where the party Las beast legally notif 94 or hi6 sppaintment. Xe aannot be lagally notified by the albrk until that o:?ioer has in his possas$ion the paty*s cozzR3b3sion.
Wo armuw question.Bo. 1 ln the negative, and eaah of the three e+mtn2u~ questionSin the affirui&lYe.
In this commotion, we call to your attQntlon for
chtaver it my be xorth, the awe of Taablm v. ZWite, 104 Tsx. cri... .iep. 70, xt s. x. 597.
~losso ccce;?t our thanks for the vary able namer
in ~:hi.ch you !mvu stated the i'uots, the questions submitted ind Ubwzised the lsf;cl points involved.
Yours v&y truly AFPROVED .TuL 12, 1939
=.&