Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
801 *4 466:olet!.oJ, [8] @J! certlfimi ,a*. &
"sec. 9. Polloier or CertMioates. lttary pcilioy or oartificats of inrruranw 166ueU by w aaaocfation .6t6ta dGffirit8lg On th6 hod 8BOAlrt 6h4n pSg8 ,QP duath bensfitw to be pafd * * t * *6 fft si:*ll'be pletxZy stated in the pollay and the tems EM acrr,bit:o;?e under atilah they shah be gal& &%A1 'x steed plsialg In th6 pollsy.
* II*,
"All condit:(@m of th8 certlffoate must b6 stated tlxrson, * * a~ 80 oartlfloete 156ued by 6U6h aa6oels- Con, nor my tqpllcation for the oertffloet8 ohall Co@tain lan&ua~~ or bs fn Suah fOrI e6 to ni6lOad the 6pplicant or tla tiollcpholder 6s to the tym of inrulc anca arrorded.
*+*a i66u6d must be l ppsw~& by tlu *livery oertLiioate Board as to rm asi4 language, betars It ia used by aa 666CNhtiOZl. ~ti6SidAI6S~t~#6t~6Oi~bO the Botird is a5xwot- for a:1 ctbociktlerm, but unir0m 8d to bring abcnt ea fireat wdfoxmity a6 is $eeslble by oooperatloa i&h the Sever- am early a? practioable 61 666OOi6t~kmJt m CsrtifiO%ts itWEl# h6P66ftW Ill!4 newt be in aclcbrd with tho provf8lozi8 QS W&J bat 8~4 with all other low6 rogalat~ sooh aibooiotiom a8 6re 6xcbraoed in tki6 Aet, I + e *
We beliero the oonolurlan iS Lne86ap8bl8 tb8t %eBHe Ml1 13S, a oaaprehenslv8 A& euver%ng a field of le&.Sl6tlos, wa8 eMet4d by the bg~SbSh~0 t0 8Oeaplhh the paparoab in ihll of ell eleins, atumrding 86 th6 mUXi.mum bensiLt pr,rovi+ ed for in the #rtifToete fernrab, by Obsyter 6 ~00~pfuile8, ~eyment Ot such clnfms. (18 aon- mperaedhg the aet!:od.bi templsted by Chopter 6, sondfti~~~ed lqmn, and lislited by, the amount thaisreor aollsotd from 666ew6entcr-o646eded. Aad f?2r- thsrmre, that E conpliame with Geia8txt $111 136 em to the eon- tents af certlrioritea ail.1 neoieasarily rem&t the S.a1u&?in6 public and the ;trospsi%ttlra c~rtlfloak hoZUerB aotuol aer- tifituh3 ho*cl&rm b&2$ fti,y %pprissd Of f&O t%atuXU Of ?ih* ia~~~~urapca tbey are piaralmring or hms pllCbhnSe+L Tb8 r0rt3~0,0i32g~e~55aer8ttlws th8 i3f~56ttm3 r86olve st iIt th8 li@d Of *Uu. #tt~~ ~ri&lplOS hBnd oi St8bUtW OO&' 6tTWtiOfi. ASI a full s$at8?aJnt of t&8 ptinotpl8r 1R.v ok&w froplth#! OE88 43i trB%' qUoT.8 011 f01h~6 BE:Tl!%kL WJ: VSr = 01%. rJfJ ., m4 6. w. af; pp 189 esia 130. cm!..= cmx
*In IronstruQg ha oat of th16 Le@.Slatw+, tba fn- tentloii of ;romur mriat gwsrg the 168lBUkkhg ts EiMw%r8d *7 lion. salter G. MoAwerd, Chaiamn, pago ‘0
by the wording of the tmt ittmlt, tagethar with the purgeee sought to be att&aeQ by the m6crtmmt of the law. ff this intsatioa i.r pl6.tnlJ 6vid6n66d 666orPi6& to theee ruI.ee, tJleIz it 3.6 the auty 0r the acmrt to uphold the fntontioa and oon6true tbs 1~ in aooozd- mice tharimlth. Ine~fmuoh 8s the QU66tbA of repeal 16 always one of nlhtive en apro &8olw8- Intent, in r6paled w1l.l not tian th,et a ymrtioular ststate ba given efiaot, uhen It 18 apparent thet bb l.egl8- 16itur6 cud zat eo i+eK&l.
"'BbarO &II 6@t iSpaS-& COY+rflyt& rhoIs of legt6latio6, of a particu&or eubjeut or field It is wetcwry to insert 6 general olause 2-w p66ling rt6;l sots 6r pttf6 of sots Incamist- aat th%i%Wfth " aad 8Uch~ 6 Ol6U66 i8 Ofilr6ti70 in repealing fniWBi6t6lkt l nRoQlnts the 6bmenoe of any oanatltut2oaal prohibftian aiacrt euoh nttthod of rapeal; buf the capeal esteo 3s only to th8e CdtCl,oa swae aubjeat, or past8 of suah a&6, oleml]r lneoxmi6toat aad iFnoea- ollable with %,he prorislon~ of the repealing 6Of,.6ad &-Illy t0 &O W%OItt Oi tb UOni~i6tiIl& grwlolona. A ett&ute is roperlad by implle~- eioa whm8ver it bemmes apparent Sroa eubsoqumat bgf6l6tfCXI that the &6&.6b&4l'6 doe6 IlOt iiItCrZt& *ha eerller eat t0 rw66Ln in icrrOr,.* * *' rtcp& repeals by iagliaattcut cn not f8roTed, it mm!W- 66x11~ remits in any oasa c& mpugunoy w iapI bstwee,a trpo 6wmis6L~e stdiutes, or 6oll6istsnoJ ia say ease nhas the intentioo.'of th6 La&i8lature Is lMUlif86t that laker atmtute ssould #qm%?wde an earlier cxi0.t Awlr5oar, k E!l&Mh all8pa10psQk of &w, Vol. 66, pe YlY.
lam. mlt6r c. waodwrd, Chafrwn, peg6 8
lrcfn. %uter c. #nodwr(s, chsfrntan, p*ge 9
r6p6al ail iorwr lwo rolstlng ta the smie taub- jsot . The ~crrreotneoP of that rule not con- is unnecrmehrp t3 altfs aclthar- t?XiVWt6d, ED& 1t itb8s in au~>poti of It.‘*
It ia t!!6rsfna as' oonai&+sred opizicn that tienat Bill 1SS r6epeal8 Cbepter 6, Tit16 78, &wised Citil i;t:&uter of Texw, and 6pse5fioall~ the red lett6r p~o~Lsi.on uontaiaad in ;crtia16 4904 therues.
It fOiiOW6, and .vou ar6 r66~6tfulXy advised, that the quaetias, mulmitt6d by ~QNI 6hsuld be aaswred In the 6fffm6tlv6; mm61p, tblst that pert or lirtic1.a C?sM, ~QQUiJ?i~~ the 9643 lott6r" olau66 certlSlioat6a d m66&36rahlp, is 230 huger ln for66 to tho66 inmman86 oosip6n5es ~iginall~ or(gaaindl -and l p@.iccrbl6 rurd6r ~tbe authorltiy of Ohaptv 98, Rerlsed 05~51 8tat 6, Tit&e Ut6a Or '2s~~.
Thi6 opinion is not 00 ba aw6tZwd &a p~srlu8 upen th6 oonctituticxtalit~ of S666t6 BflL 155, or of any fS it6 prori-