History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-3102
Tex. Att'y Gen.
Jul 2, 1941
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 I OFFICE OF THE AnhNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

Board or Dirootora

Tana Collsgr of Arts k Induatri~

Ilin~;mill.r, Texae

xmar Slrat

allege of A&# and under ths iaotn Gorsrnor O*Danlel undertook l&fir4 for the DUrpOSO Oi rred sxietsa on Juns 65, g lsttsr of appointment to -ia\Psen---~--- "I 89 to&x appointing the r0ii0ring 00 Member8 or t t 43 3306rd .0r Bwmtr 0r Tsxam

col.lrge or Art8 and Imlu$trie# at r%wevlllr,

ror six year termq $0 srplrr Jun6 20, 1947r

-1 Bert3 or Direotors, Texss Colls~e of Arts di Industries, pags t

..

OYorrl.8 Robe&, Victor18

H. S. Wltts, Corpus Chrfsti Cal, Mrs. J, E, King, San Antonio _ 'Tleass issue the above oommlsslons at your earliest opportunIt7, i

"Slnoenly yours, /s&l/ W. Leo OQsnlel Oersrnor of TOZBS.~ Subsequently, on J\rly Z9, 1941, this dapartmant hala In opinion No. O-3384 that the terms of members or this Board oomnmnoad and terminated as OS September 1 whererore no vaoan- ales would sxlst on the Beard a8 of June 84. No other action with regard to the matter was taken by Covernor OQDaniel.

On Au.gmt 4, 1941, Governor O%~nlsl assumed tit.8 ofrlos of United states Senator, thereby vaoatlng the orfior or Covernor an4 Lieutenant Governor Coke Stevenson became Governor or Taxas.

ve are advised that the lniormal rsoords or the I Seorstary or state lndloatsa that t4m tsm~ 0r 0rrl00 ot the

threr dlr6otors lnrolrad erplrrd on Jtms 25, 194l, and that :. Corernor OQanlelw~s so lnfonaeb; The bovamor u&art&ok

to appoint nr. Roberts, Mr. mitt =a lm. xlng to six-yesr tmns ending June Sb; 1947. ObvlOUrly for a six-year term to end June 25, 1947, it must oonunsnos on June 85, 1941.

The Gotsrner~s letter 0r ap ointment dsmonstrat~s an intent

to tillvaoanols8 Whloh ha i run& 6xlstWl on J&H 25, IOU, at whloh time he wss OOV6rnWe It nauld oppose the express language of the appointment lstter~-to~sa that he purpcssb ~~rr~lll~~nolr8 on the Board whloh wo up d arise on Septem- .

,

~~oonsequenoe, we (Lo not belirve that ths faots warrant the oonoluslon that Governor OQanlel lntendea to mke ths a pointments involved as of Sepbmber 1, if the

appointmen 5 should be iOr any reason 1nafiectlVe as Of f

June Zb. Yoreover, It 1s doubtful if an appointment expressly rslatsd.to a purported vacanoy on a prior date would oon- rtituts as a matter 0r law, a mid appointixnt to a

prospeo$lte aotual Vaoanoy on a later date,

I, . . +i

4.32 Jo Board Oi Dlrsotors, TOW! Colle&e or Arte & Industries, m~s 3

Ii, however, the appofntnonts under :avlen bs re- ~~varded as lntsndsd for, an4 stisotivs as of, September 1 it is cur opinion that they would none the lass br Inefrectfts.

Upon the question of prospective a polntnents, es surs to occur lrorc appolntmmts in advancs to fill vccaqo i!

subssquently in publlo olrloea, them Is u#anlnlty or apin- Ion among the o:urts that suoh eppolntmnts are Invalid ii the tann ai the ofilce fillad OSMOt be& until tho tom of the agpolntln~ ymer an4 the power to apaolnt .havs ax- gdred.

It was deolnrod by tha Sugrom Court of Alabarra la Oberbaue v. State, 173 Ala. 4E3, 55 So. 8C8, 9028

*&e have oarefully oxrrnlned the cuthorl- ties on this pro~osltlon, and, as th:!re Is co ~~tcrlal o;~dllot a-::ong thsz, It Is zot naow- sary to hnre roproduoe tb:rslr Ian@%-a or rea- eonlnl, Tncp clearly 5ert.15 the lnw to the 0rr00t that the appointing sower or,:.nnot fora- atoll. the ri ~.hts nn4 ?roro:$ntivns of Its mm aucowwor by a-.pointln~ auooeasom to 0friOflm whose otrloiel terms sXplr0 oontsm;~oranooua- ly with or altar the sx?imt.ion of the tern of the n?poIntlng ,?bwsr; but whore, by law or porsonsl aotion, the ol'fioe to t:e filled by appointment vxnt bsooma vnoant by the ex- PiratIon of the lnouabezd's tann or by his withdrawal during the tmn oi the epi‘oint- llr~ ;wwem, a prom~eotlve appol:it?.ant thnre- to, if not forbidden by law, zsy be zade at ;l;~qmlant sermon before the aotilr.1 erpira- Xsohsn on imbllo Off1085 an4 Ofrlosrs, ! !$I Throop on Publlo Offloers, I 92; 28 k. . 2, ;Pnay. Lnw, 347 29 CYO. 1373; Slitit OX ml, *&rrls v. 3ull van 01 Ohio St. 79, 90 i

N. 5. 146, Et L. R. A. IN. 3.) 514, ou.4 riots; Stnts sx rd. Mltnay v. Van Buskirk, 40 1;. J. IA%W, 463; State ex rsl. Child% v.
O'Leary, 64 t.'dM. EC7, 66 11, viii. 264. And this ws hold to be the law,"

In aceor& nro tha Non York C~SRS of 2eoAde v+ Fitz- ...~mlfl, 180 N, y. 269, 73 f:. ::. 53, fml Town0 v. Fortor, 1% kgps1bts IiivisIon 717, l..l3 ::. Y. Su>, 72s. In the first oaae the Court of Appeal? Bpidl

Board OS Direotors, Tsxaa, Colle:!e ‘of Arts & Industrlas, Pago

*. . , An appointment to office in antf- olpation of a vaoancy therein is good only in

oaee the offloor aeakia the eppointmnt lr still in offlcc when the vecanoy occurs.”

To tho sam ofteot em the Ohio oases of Stats T. Caen, 98 Ohio State 277, 117 1:. E. 238, and State v. Sulll- ran 81 Ohio Btete 76, 30 FJ. X. 145. In the first oesa

men loned, t it yyes doclared~

” . . . It hem generally been held that the appointing power bar lull authority to antlol-

pet0 vecanoiea in its ep olt&nsnts. This legal

prinol al, however, la 1 mlted ! in that suoh

veeano le as, whetter by reslgnatlon or en,plra-

tion of terzn, mmt ocaur during ths life of

the agpolntlng gowar, The letter oannot saddle

upon its uuoosssors appointerr whore ottlolal

terns are to begin thereafter. , . .”

The rule ww sxprsssed as follows by the Suprem Court of Maine in Pattangall v, Oilman, 115 MB. 344, 98 93bl

Atl.

ma . . The authorltias are &enlmouely - in favor of the proposition that, if tho term

or the appointing power extehd8 beyond the

point of tAna when ths veoanoy arises, a

prospeotlve appointment mey be made! and that Lf the tam of the appoint-

conversely

ing power d 06s not extend unti1.e veoancy

arises in the eppointive offior, no appolnt-

mnrtnt, prospeotlve or otherwise, may be mede

by that appointing power. The reason 1s

slrnpls. The appointing p&&r oanriot fore-

stall the rlghts and prerogatives of his own

auooessor by appointing suaoessors to office

beginning after his yovrar to appoint ha8

itself expired.”

See also Ivy v, Lusk 11 Le. Ann. 4861 State V.

blerhen, 45 N. J. Law 1891 Peoph v, Ward, 107 Gel. 836,

40 Pea, 5381 48 Corpus Uurls, 1 64, p. 9% -1

r

Eoard of Dlrrotora, Texer Ooll8gr of Art8 B Indurtrler, Faga 8 .,

The untlerlylng rea8ons for these pronouncement8 by the oourtr epply with r8peolel force to tha matter et

hand. Governor O'Dani81 had ennounoed for end hi& been

eleoted to the orflos of United Stats8 Senator. Upon errrum- lng this offloe h8 would eutomatloelly veoete the offioe

Of Governor and Lisutsnent Gov8rnor Stevenson would beoom8 hi8 8uooe88or. Thereupon, Governor OQanlel~8 appointing

power muld expire, Xhen tM8 muid ooour via8 a matter to

br dsclded by him alone. So long e8 ha ohoes to remein e8

Oovernor it we8 his right to mak8 eppolntmenta to fill

veoenoler In publio offloe whloh had arisen, and to make

prosp8otivr appointments to fill vaoenole8 whloh would

aria8 while he continued to oooupp tho office of dovernor

end we8 po88rssed of the appointing power. During this

time, how8ver he wea, in our opinion, without the power

to make entloipato appolntnents to fill vacanoles whioh would erlee after h 8 appointing power bad termbated. Thr 7: paver to fill veoenoles erlrlng after h8 left the Gover-

nor*8 offio8 18 the prerogative of Oovsrnor %8von8on, hi8

aucoosaor, and oould not br forestalled by any eot ot Governor OlDeniol, whether under e mlatake of faot or other- wlae.

Aotuelly the fact8 oonrlnoingly lndloate that Governor O%enlel was mer8ly undertaking to fill oBoeno

upon the Board which he oongldered had already arisen.

Doubtleaa he would have made no attempt to fill the thre8

meobsrehlps on the Board of the College had he known et

the time that the offioes would not beoome wcent until

September I.. In any event, it lo the oplnlon of thls,de-

partment that tho aotlon of Corernor OWeni in na!alng Mr. Roberts, Mr. Butt and Mr8. King to the Board of Dlreo- tore of the Tmxe8 Collsgo of Arta & Indu8trie8, under the

faots whloh we have reviewed, 18 of no fore6 and rffsot

end thnt the three menberahipr on the Board whloh will

beooms vacant on September 1, 194l ece 8ubject to being

filled by appointment by Governor 4 tevonuon.

Very truly your8

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1941
Docket Number: O-3102
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.