Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN *2 %os. %. b. Allan, QE@@ a
Eon. 8. b . AllaL%, grg4 b
In opioioo 30. O-886, this Ge rtzmt FxdC that a sbsriff or soast8bls vwfn be s=titbd to 0 r 8 umal livs per @@it I8fii) oail*otloa tw on tke trial ir* in the fwtiw ecurt, li ho sotuallp sol&sotsd the trial r88, *s ml1 as on the iii20 in seib ocurt, it he aatwlly sollsotod the rino in said wurt.
Bsforr paflo6 ovsr the cunowt ot the tine whieb hu bear. dollsofOd In tts mnw or Sot tbs um of ths State or ovunty, tkr QfflOWU w?a mra responsible ter the aollaotior; are en- *ltt& to dsttuot 88 oOsmls8iono flftasn per 4wt (l#G)of #I* emmint-ten par 0-t (lO$) rcr the dletxiict or iwunty sttor- nsf, aad fly0 Jmr oent (WI tor tlrs Ols.erl ot oourt ar other 0rfl0w ehwged by 38~ wlt4 the e033eetio~ or tar rm. -- Texan a.arleprudsno~, Vol. 19, page fms. In the OQM o? I4hantw Cabmty v. EoggeWo et al, lS7 5. 99’. 846, war tp lindlrrg of lbati *St out in WI& oas+, it 116 sta%ed that:
8htIt tte exwola@ ar 8uOh duty ot oollrobion IIyans only th8ir autiwrlty to rwdvs ths mxioy ?XWG tb* psrron saluagsd to p&f, or imar the oiiioer by 8&m it 1s 1s tabt OoUOQteU, md pay ovar to ths preps? sour oar . l
*T&o oG@rts of this litate bsve rdogtd tkw ml10 of oon8tru rtrio%ly t&wee statute8 prworib- in6 rw8 ror pub o orfZOOr8 *ma ag8inst pmbf.ttlnl; 3
such tnrs by implioetrlon a8 ro@sx%is both thb fix- 21~6 cl t&a iaes anb the ofriser who is to reoslre tham. . . *EC public oS'losr QUA rl$46raa* Zrcm t&a rtato tfrasury, or ita9OllJ in it8 Oixw*e 'to t&s tnmury, any Bo5oy without 8 l4r wA%hQrASin$ hiE?l .*. tc do ao, an4 olwrly itri~ag the awmnt.~* = (Par*athrsir ourr)