Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF THE ATI-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN RonorableY. B. Qampboll
couhty AlaitQr
Xaaagdodms County
Xaoagdoohe8, Toxar
Dear sir:
Be1 cgdnion x0. C-3934 Tit10 to bridge on h I g hnay l banaonea by - ~~~~~~RQJtway .
X0 aoknowle~e reootpt of you]: IOtter of Iloptrbmz 5, 194l, requONlWtho apinion at thfs tho tolloring faot nituation whbh a0~0rhupon im p0tea ha8 your lottort
*I mud like to knor if the old bribge 18 the property of the State Him Deput- amit or waoogaoahes antl Angolina Co\mtiea.w *2 -. 615
Honorable lb. B. Campbell - Page 2
The roiioning provision appears In Artlole 6674Q-9 Vornon*6 Revised Olril Statutes of Texas: . . provided, howover, that nothing provided, howover, that nothing
“. “. . . in thla Aat shall prsvent the State Hlghusy in thla Aat shall prsvent the State Hlghusy abandoning sny Comlaslon rran ohanglngor abandoning sny Comlaslon rran ohanglngor We aasume from your stetament or the mot sltuatlon that the bridge in question was oonstruoted jointly by.Angellne and !?aoogdoohee Countlee on the river uhloh is the boundary line between the two oountles. Under the above quoted statutory provision the Oomufssloners Oourts of Neoog- doohea and Angellne Counties may eseume jurlsdlotlon orer the bridge desorlbsd in your opinion remost, and the bridge till then oouupy the s-0 status as any other property belonging to the Countlea of Hactogdoohes and Angellne.
Yours very truly ROIFS
OPlNlON 0. CoMMnTss APPROVED t+!E2$