Case Information
*1 OFFICE 0~ TIIE A~ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
Honorable T. Z. Hllkineorr
County Auditor, Hill County
Elllaboro, Tsxae
our l rrr are thoea artho rlsed 1 Oounty, datb4 April 10, ta si S$ per enmaei, and whloh ~oialeeloaece’ Court of thm able to be darlvti from the #alo and maintenenos netruotlon
It now apgwwe that a oh bonle. end: the oouty de for the rate thsroor and he rroelrrd to enoh l drertl#ment.
hat Road Dietriot lfumber 6 of Hill County in the aounty, Artlole 066&o? lbrnon’8 Anno- t8tad aitil 6tatute8, would oonetituto the l.rgal airaotioa for Thfe artlelo proridoe that, after ap- the l ele of l uoh bode. proval ard mgietratlon a8 provided by law m>atirb to 0th~ eontinue in the ouetody an& oontml bonde, eueh bond8 ehall or the Coedeelonere’ in the oountg in whiah the+ were Court
. leeuod and shall bo by raid oourt sol6 to the U#hwt l d for oaeh, olthor in rhola or la mroc)l8, but at bert bhr aot 1err thrlr ? value, ad tha po?ahaBr moarr thorn-. then the Ootmt~Tparart fog rush eount~ .rplu, b. J.urb E fu bha'avafld%la road~iadl ror euah p01101041 td~thr.~6rdlAf eubulildor or-xoa4IIli*rlot. 1% will be awn that thr above rtiituto '~'oO~%ot rOquir0 the l bvrrtlrmunt for bldrl %he only du$y lmperd upon the Qoou#e~lonerr* Court with @fwonor Co thr eala .id road dietriot bolld* le WI&&* rousf~ehaU rul aeld bold8 to the blghet dnd.bert .'blbdor for;m#W&t not ‘i .~ than the par value or tW .:boi#r. ’ ‘I ~. leer