Case Information
*1 .
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
e-ahum ---
f?ononble 0. C. &rear
Taxam Bighuay Engineer Terao ‘El&way Deportment
Austin, %xar
Deer 9I.r~
he14 ia the r Daparteent . 16~1 hprn,
you in~-oonMoUon o the Sate Treemarer. 90. 248Ui' wAgpfioation
Jilt Il. CLAW Pi AL.,
Responl9elltr,
Honorable D. 0. Cr6or. i’ag6 2
The abcue-m@&mred snd 6utitled cppllcet ion6 for wplta of error were fllsd in the u6ua6 of et al. V. Class et al;, iJo. 11641, in the Ztotr Court of Civil Appeals at OolVoeton. The opinion In of the Court of Civil Qp6616 Ia r6pDrt6d (26) 296, end wo refer to that oplnlou for 9.J. l full 6t&tem4nt of the foot6 and iaeu66 involved. on February 17, 1943, we *Refucsrd ror l3eretorore. Bat !Xerlt* botE oi the above ar:rllostlotm. ..- lnC1 oated It .fr now o~rred t ts order8 atma tbst be, an& the atme am hereby, smt bsld6, %nd that both Of a’e$d %~~liO%thXl6 be Refwed.
O&nlon d6Uvrrsd
April 21, 1903.” The ~upremo Court, by Its order above
quoted, has, uncsr Rule of Prooadrlre 4a3, ag?rovod the prlnoipl66 or 16~ drolwed in the opinloo of the Court of Civil ?ppml.6, to t&o 0rr80t that your %epartmmti ha6 no iat~ereat in the f&a in- &rod abut.
Ronorable D. C. Cirwm, Page
Id the 11;:ht or the changed order of tho %prme Court, it Sollows, In our oplnlon, tka: the oheok6 aentloncd by jrqu 6hould now roturnod to the r66peotlve oollsotorr.
Yours Vary truly