*1 OFFICEOFTHEA-ITORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS
AUSTIN
gal opinion of th5.a de- oertalo add04
between the . ir not tn 8e8sbm at rel501ut1an on tils ure,wruld theaovernor to appoint a eom6i8elen- rith a aot0ifedoa4r or 4 of Tat811 to outer iota king toward futmation of a tenipaet med by the legfelatnres of Taaua
the Uaitul atateot* to adtim, a6 pu wme adrlsed in Oginfon No, o-4242, that the mgirlaturerr of Oklahoma aad Wm3.n OoQld lawfully tmttw tit0 ouoh a oo~ipact ae uaa th1We5.n sug- geated with reScenaeto tbMng andhuatkngin tkome ax-w ot the l tat4a lauadet4d W th e uaters of Denlaoa ba a, but uf art hot rdTf8ed a8 to whether or not the do~lsrnor of Okla- hoao could appotat a aomxtdssioaer to aegcW.ate vith a ecm- alcafoaer Srea Texas to Pomulate suab a aoapsat. Ilo dfxxbt *2 by the ~egtdwtrea 41 Oklahoara aad Texfw. gzr t ~OUOV~Q fotwulated oould a:awquenbl~ be ap-
OPINION (I COMMlTrKL
APPROVED BY L&F *