Case Information
*1 OFFICE OF l-HE A’I-I’ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN
Honorable T. M. Trlnble
91r6t Lssistant State Super-
Intender.+ of Public Inetruotlon
Austin, Texae
Dear Sir:
Texee be dlseolvsd? eaureatseu to 0 8, oi TOML), re- y Goneral rtaient on the above ed ana has bad our at- letter fe 8 letter from or the Sortna xndependent exmi addreseed to Dr. L. A.
r an agreement existfne between or Taxw an6 mw Kexioo an6 in the year of about 1937 a atata line district of this oounty consofldated with a eimilar The ocnsolldatlon dfetrict in Hew Sedao. ~8s brought about to iaeurs k&h echo01 fa- ciliti6:+ ti; the Tern0 diE:tTiOt,.
Ton. T. E. Trimblo, Pegr R
“Hecontlp the klgh sohool, which me looetec on the mm xexloo eido, WW dono away with, end now the Texas r0ik lea0 the a~trrnet~re OS having to eon6 their )ligh to anothar eoholil ohildrea so30 dietanoe Hew EOX~OO klyk a&m01 or S%ndiw 8 WOY to saod them to a Texae Blah aehool not a0 rer from thea. removed
‘It eppeerc that the poop10 on tbo Texas elds are about u&mirmu in their doeiro to go to a T8x.6~ rokoel end a Teprerentatlre group Or the DOODi0 08~0 $0 the B&.X&@ 8Ohool borrd cad ask that I aits to you about the mtter aad ask what II any proordure they might pur~uo to keep thelr hl@ 8ohool ohil6nn :a Texas.
be a satter of tact, they deslro to diseolve ‘the ooneolidetlon end seed all their ohildron to the Texas sob001 or eahoolr. so that elkher
-The district Is looeted ?arwell or ~orfae OT both aotlld very well ro- oelrr the ahildron and they (the ohlldron) would not k8ve so very rat to travel.
-Tti.eee people ra::la appreoiatm your ebvi*o.* In the year 1935, by II. R. 278 Chapter 22C, the Laplelature of the Etete oi To&m reth’ied b oompaot betaeon the State of Hew MexIeo anQ the State Or Teser to eatnbllsh the CItete Line Zahoo;l Dietriot in iiueetion. x0 keve no inSonn!tivn ea to whetkrr or not Leglslstum OS New L'exlao did likewire.
IS the Lo$ielrture 0r both said states ntiried tbe oc,..paot eatebllski~ eraid eohool %lstrlot, than it would rsgtiiro the sotion oS tha Legfalature or euoh or raid states to abollsk sane, It 8uoh abolition to be eeoollplfshe6 in sn orderly way. A ooqwot between etatee way ba an&d by ooneeet, or it may be en.f'oroad by 81,ther port)r thereto, but J
Pon. f. I+?‘. Triable, Fags 3 thJuaioatimi of righta uadbr no. interstate compmt
ir a Fader81 qmstlon for deterrafnstion by the United .,tater supram Court. Art. 3, Sea. 2, t’, S. Comtltu- tion. t. Ed. 1E35, Iihod. 18l~nd 16. &%BBtIOhUS#tt8,9 hiB#Ouri va. xllfnoie, zoo 0. s. 496.
AB rtnted abort, wb oannot knoa from the flWDidlB8 UD UhOtheS HBW IdOXtOO LB&S- infOXDU#tiOIJ If ib did #Us, l nd in l2BtifiBa Mid OW~Ot. 1fttlWB before the ulb l ohool dirtriot 0~83 be thBt l writ, legally di~rolr~d rush dirrolution mat be l atEOriso~ by the LBgiBlature of both U&b 8tetBB, rln6@ 80 a&hod of diw.io1otii-m irr proriaed ror in the oaupaot.
tie wish it to ba understood t&t w8 ate not ex~~~r;ing any opilrion aw to the righta af orodltors, ii any, O? rush whoa1 dlstriot.
3. P. moo ABShteDt