History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-6627
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1945
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

l!onorabYe PonaYd M. XnrkIe, Chairman

Comzzittee on Conetitlttional' Amendments

~:OUWJ of Rcprcuentatioos

4Rth Lt?gi!slature

An&in, Texafi

Opinion #a. 0-6627 Ccneral Opinion_Nos. Mny 30, 1046, re- d dircunstances surrounding y the Loglslaturo and of State’s OPCice to counties of the statej order to fully 0xpYore is prOQOUea amendment it

ry for you t.n tnke into nacount any rele- your direot i~nvesti.gatlon of the exiut- ceu may reveal,. Thi.a my understanding s In thiu. ease:

*I am inlormed by the office of the Secretary of Stat.0 that He J. n. 13 was mailed to 238 newspapars on Tuefiday evcninp, Yav 22, P04!5; the sam asy it wan re- c~ef~cd in thnt off-lco. ia publi~heti In Xo noxsnnpx- the rclrai.nlng 16 counties. The acLnovlcd,~ant cards, on the dotos specj~- ncce~tin.~ t,l?o COnY for rnh7icntion was roturned hwdiatoly hy 2’24 publishers. Of ficti, the 14 who wrote to say the ?npy missed their dondline, *2 3,329

3,014 Fr1aay 480 Est. I,m33 S,QEK) lkxlnesday 12,451 1,3&3 41 ,o23 FrCioy 2,607 1) nm Thursday rr,rrr?4 Friday 12,372 MXJ 33st .Thtwuaay 10,0&l R*3Sr, r,n3r, Thursday 12,032

legn33y sub?dttcd for a vote on August 25, 10451

"(2) Irrospeotive of your anmer to question

P;umher 1, will the aiiandmont ?3ecosra a part of the onnstitution should It eppar on tho hsllot and moeive a nzajorlty of the VoteR cast?"

You are advIsed that uixler the facts etated House Joint Rep#lut.lon Ho. X3 is Mint: Xegally nOmItt& with this ~ImlIfication, go@@ of the OOuntias ‘We save has not hoen hly puhl1~hed fop uant nP sdfieient time. Tb3s IrroguJzr- ity ~111 not necessarily prevent I:!:e sdoption OF the amencJmcnt hy the people unless the total potcntid leg-al vote In those cmmtlos where no publicntlon was had nnd no eJeot.ion @clcJ if counter1 ap$inst the a&?tion of the mencl- WOtsld he suff3clont mnti to result in the amendment's receiving less tfinn a =a- lority of fiueJl total count. In such event the amendment would ret1 for lack of+ the neoessnry majority vote. SOS the Pol.1 oa- snf? cascm

IhmnlCut to State, 12 6. i?. 106;

I:etxwt v. Scurloc!~, 17," i;. V. 711;

Uanos v. State, 203 S. E. 310.

We trust thc~t what we hffvo &id suffiolontJy answers blth of your questioas.

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1945
Docket Number: O-6627
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.