History
  • No items yet
midpage
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
O-7361
| Tex. Att'y Gen. | Jul 2, 1946
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

Honorable George Ii. Sheppard

Comptroller of Publib Accounts

Austin, Texas

Dear Siri opinion MO. 0-7361

Re: Wnether trucks stocked in the city of Aaarill

store tax on the 8ix a

plenished and serviced same source8 as hi8 At times he will a ripplies frorol one rueks will each be owned by the aanw at will be operated on a partnership; .operator the truck uill receive s of,tho nut proceed8 and one-third will go to the truck QPmer- There may be some question

as to the control these trucke, but under the

present plan, It is the understanding of this de-

partment that they will be controlled by the owner of the store.

*Question: Will push trucks be suljject to

the Chain Store Tax Law?"

607. 1.

I

Honorable Ceorgs HI Sheppard, Page 2

In response to our request for additional inf or- mation,on December 3, 1946, you advised us further:

“You recently received from this de art- for an opinion as to whet R~ er a

ment a request

truck making ealre would be subject to the

atore tax. I am furnishing you with informa-

tion secured, by Mr. John U..Yileon( District

Tax Supervisor in Amarillo.

Vhere are two tracks operating In the

Amarillo district. One Is a semi-trailer

making sales in Plrasant Valley, which is

north of Amarillo. The other truck ie a

f&you:;el trailer operating in the City of

“The merahandiee is picked up at one

of the stores and placed in the truck in

display form. The truak then proceeds down

the street contacting housewives and other

potential buyers. They, in turn, enter thio

partiaular truak, make purahases of the mer-

chandlee displayed, and pay for same inside

the truck.

“The sal.es are made in the truoks. The

merchandise 1s not delivered by truck drivers

or salesmen to the purchasers in their homee.”

Whether or.not the trucks and trailers in question are stores ie determined by the definition of the term *store” aa contained in the Taxae Chain Store Tax Law (house Bill 18, Ch. 400, Acts J+l+th Leg. 1st C. 3. 1933, Codified aa Art. lllld, Penal Code), said definition reading as follows: The term tstorel as used in this Vea.

Aat, shall be construed to mean and include elly

store or stores or any mercantile eetablisbment

or establiahmeuts not epeaifiaally exempted with-

‘in this Act which are owned, operated, maintained, or controlled by the 331ne person, agent receiver, copartnership or aesoc-

trustee, firm, oorporation, iation, either domestic or foreign, in which goods, wares or merohandiee of any kind are aold, at re-

tail or wholesale,* (Underscoring ours),

6aEa ,.

Honorable George H. Yhepperd, Page 3

You etatr in effect that these truoke and trallore are plaoee, *in which goodah weree and merchandise are eo1d.n Therefore, if theso vehialse ere wetoreeR end/or %eraentile l etabliehmeqte w then they would constitute uetoree~ within the Chein Store Tex Len. the meeniag

The word *etom* was defined by the Commission of ,. A eels in the ease of Continental Paper Beg Co, v, Boeworth~, 2 8 8. W, 170, as follower f

The term *meraentlle eetabliehment+l is defined in 21 Corpus Jurie 904 as follawe~

*A plea. where the buying and eellin ertialre of aerahandlee de an employment f e aonduated.* ..ds-’ Tha Supreme CourO of the United States in the aaee Fox v. Ytendud Oil 00. 294 U. S. 93, 79* LI Ed. 786, in aonetruin the Chein Store Aot of the State of Weat Virginia, (whioh de inea’the word &ore in tha identical phraseology as the Tetie Gheln Store Aat) in en opinion by Mr. Justice Cardosa, used the.following lenguago: * + The ‘goods offered for aale are to *.

be underlltoad es having reference to goods *of sny kind * and thaplaae at which the eale is mede ehefl lnalude,not only plaaee that in the WE:; e erch of men would be designated as .E ut broadly sneaking. eny meroantile eetebliehment, whether a rtoic o? something &e** (Undoreaorlng ours). iven us, and the definl-

Based upon the facts as tione of the,worde and terms used f n the Cnein Store Act, our Courts, we together with the aonetruation given b t h at the trucks end arrive at the ineeaapeble aonclueion *4 ,! Honorable Georke H. Sheppard, Page 4

~trailera are *merosntile establiehaente in which goode, weres and marohandlrew are cold. In fact, auoh vehialee 80 equipped and used. amount,.~. in our opinion, to a atore on wheels. A store is a atort;: whether mobile or immobile. “.

W4 trust *@at we hate eatiefaotorb4ly answered your inquiry.

Yours vary truly ATTORNEY OENEUL OF TEXAS By+*

w. v.. cappart Aaatstanlr

Case Details

Case Name: Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Court Name: Texas Attorney General Reports
Date Published: Jul 2, 1946
Docket Number: O-7361
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Att'y Gen.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.