Case Information
*1 PRICE DANIEL ATTORNEY GENew
April 19, 197 Opiaion R0. V-156 Hon. Paul R.~Bmnm
secretary of stpt@J
Austin;. Texas ! Re: The euthorlty of the Sk-
re$ary of State to a0eept, sis.psyaent. for~cepltsl stock, legal aervlces ren- dered before the filillg of
Deer Sir: obai-tta~~spplicrtfoa.
th6 foxi&ag w&a ior .Texas 350;' Ai R. xy xy. co. v. Grar&w, 4cAllster v. ‘&Clipse Oil Co., 92 S.W. (26) .:: 545; end 8 T.L’;& 20&. .
‘%~a tbe'rttoraey~s Sees ~aadeti theSe o.b- cumstewe.b be.scoepted by thla. ditoe a8 pep- merit for oopital stwk?"
The NLQ bf XuW #Qlioeble'to the fact8 abWe lnirsh in the case of Heok- met forth La Meted la the neg V. York, la s.u. (28) 92 . "?;
"rt was cle&~Qg held inW@therford, M. W. % N. W. BaLlwey Co..v. Qmnger, 86 795, W&n. St. Rep, 837, Tex. 350, 24 8.~.
that theofeie o.fsa attorney IIn advising 8s to thexwtid%es of iuco~aratloa aad in cor- rectitqj end preparine: tb&e~*peF' aoulB "t
:.
Hon. Paul H. Brown - Psge 2,~V-l56
be charged egainst the oox-poetlon eiter the flllag of Its charter, id the absence of e provlalon In the statutes or in the articles of lnoorporeflqkorotlng this burden upon It." . .
!Che attorney's feesfor such leg81 services., 08MO$ be aooepted in pert pa-& or theol+taZ st*lr;.. . of sold corporatiou.'
SUMMARY Legel eemlces rendered prior to ln- oorporatlomdo-not oomitltute labor done a0 as to oonstltute peyment of nepltal stook subaor%bed sWi~~ttm:p*~~visione sot . Article XII, Section 6, 4?otm$itutOn~ot" ). -.
Texab or,Artiole 1308, .Revlsed Civil Stat- tltea 1 pi wyv,, 1925,; ..~ Ai
.
. ,. 1’ .‘.’ ..,., ‘~ I:. :
,.