Case Information
*1 . TEE ATTOECNEY GENERAL UD,PmXAS' AXiwrIS, TEXAS 18711 November 29, 1972 Honorable Hugh C. Yantis Opinion No. M- 1272 Executive Director
Texas Water Quality Board Re: Whether a person employed P. 0. Box 13246, Capitol Station as a secretary at the Texas Austin, Texas 78711 Water Quality Board may
lawfully sell copies of her transcripts of minutes of the agency and charge Dear Mr. Yantis: therefor.
Your request for an opinion reads in part as follows: "Our agency often receives requests for transcripts of monthly meetings of the Texas Water Quality Board. It has been our practice to satisfy these requests by allowing the per- sons making the request to make a copy of the magnetic tape which is our official record of the meeting. One of the secretaries, employed by this agency, prepares the minutes of our Board meetings. She uses a shorthand machine to record the meeting, but only prepares ver- batim transcripts of the parts of the meeting which are needed for our purposes. It would be a convenience to the general public, al- though of small benefit to our agency, to be able to purchase transcripts of Board meetings from this secretary.
II . . .
"We respectfully request an opinion on whether or not this secretary can make and sell for her own profit transcriptions of Texas Water Quality Board Meetings."
In Moore v. Sheppard, 144 Tex. 537, 192 S.W.2d 559 (Tex. Sup. 1946), it was held that Clerks of the Courts of Civil Appeals were not required to account to the State Treasurer for sums of *2 money collected for uncertified and unofficial copies of opinions, wherein it was stated:
,I . . . The general principle prohibiting public officials from charging fees for the
performance of their official duties does
not prohibit them from charging for their
services for acts that they are under no
obligation, under the law, to perform. . . .
11. . .
"There being no statutory duty requiring petitioners to furnish uncertified, unofficial
copies of opinions of the Courts of Civil Appeals, no statute fixing any fee for such services, and no valid statute requiring that money received
therefore be deposited in the State Treasury,
there is no debt owing by petitioners to the
State. Since petitioners are not required to
account to the State Treasurer, under the exist- ing statutes, for such receipts, they cannot be
required to execute an affidavit that such funds have been deposited in the State Treasury as a
condition for the delivery of their monthly
salary warrants."
It is our opinion that the principle of law announced in Moore v. Sheppard is equally applicable to other State employees in the absence of relevant statutes. We have been unable to find any statute requiring the furnishing of transcripts of the meetings of the Board to the public. Therefore, it is our opinion that a secretary employed by the Texas Water Quality Board may make transcripts of official meetings of the Board and sell them and retain the pro- ceeds provided such acts do not interfere with the performance of her duties as a State employee.
SUMMARY A secretary employed by the Texas Water Quality Board may make transcripts of official meetings of the Board and sell them and retain the proceeds pro- vided such acts do not interfere with the performance of her duties as a State employee. *3 I
ney General of Texas Prepared by John Reeves
Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
Kerns Taylor, Chairman
W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman
Max Hamilton
Bill Craig
John Traylor
Bob Lemens
SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL
Staff Legal Assistant
ALFRED WALKER
Executive Assistant
NOLA WHITE
First Assistant