Case Information
*1 The Attorney General of Texas
July 8,198O
MARK WHITE
Attorney General Opinion No. MW-205
Honorable Henry Wade Dallas District Attorney
Sixth Floor, Records Buildiw Re: Mechanics of increasing the Dallas, Texas 75202 assessment ratio to 100%. Dear Mr. Wade:
You heve inquired about the increase to 100 percent of the assessment ratio used to determine ad valorem property tax in Dallas County. You have already increased the assessment ratio to 100 percent for the current tax Ye=. Section 26.02 of the Property Tax Code provides that all property shall be assessed at 100 percent of its appraised value as of January 1,1981. You first ask whether the commissioners court must convene as a Board of Equalization to adopt an order to increase the assessment ratio for the 1980 tax year. This question is currently in litigation, now pending before the San Antonio Court of Civil Appeals, styled Bexar County, Texas v. Connell Leasim Company, No. 16461. It is the policy of this office to decline to write on questions which are in litigation. sey w--$m.~ General Opinion V-291 (1947); Letter Advisory No. 142 (19’77 .
will not enswer your first question.
You also ask whether the public hearing and adoption process required by article 7244c, V.T.C.S., must be scheduled so as to occur during a regular term. Article 2354, V.T.C.S., provides that “[nlo county tax shall be levied except at a regular term of the court, and when ell members of said court are present.” Article 2348, V.T.C.S., provides for regular terms of the commissioners court. Article 7244c, V.T.C.S., provides that a taxing tmit may not adopt a tax rate that exceeds the previous year’s rate by more than three percent until it hes held a public hearing cn the proposed increase. Sec. 2. This statute is applicable to counties. A tax levy is the legislative act which determines that a tax shall be laid and fixes the amount. Amalmo v. Carter, 212 S.W.2d 950 (Tex. Civ. App. - Beaumont 1948, wm nr.e.X has been held that an order fixing the tax rate constitutes a levy. Victory v. State, 158 S.W.2d 760 (Tex. 1942). Since fixing the tax rate is a necessary part of levying a tax, we believe it should be accomplished in regular session as required by article 2354, V.T.C.S. However we & not believe the public hearing required by article 7244c, V.T.C.S., must necessarily take place in regular session, as long as the adoption of the tax rate takes place in regular session within the time period following the hearing which article 7244~ specifies.
P. 661 *2 (NW-205)
Honorable Henry Wade - Page Two
SUMMARY The tax rate for ad valorem property tax must be adopted at a regular term of the commissioners court. However, the hearing required by article 7244c, V.T.C.S., need not be held in regular session.
MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas JOHN W. FAINTER, JR.
First Assistant Attorney General
TED L. HARTLEY
Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by Susan Garrison
Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
C. Robert Heath, Chairman
Jon Bible
Walter Davis
Susan Garrison
Rick Gilpin
Myra McDaniel
Bruce Y oungblood
P. 662