Case Information
*1 THE ATTORSEX- GESERAL OF TEXAS
December 19, 1990 JM-1264 Honorable Bob Bullock Opinion No.
Comptroller of Public
Accounts Re: Whether the county attorney of Fayette County is entitled to L.B.J. State Office Bldg. be compensated as a district at- Austin, Texas 78774
torney (RQ-2084) Dear Mr. Bullock:
you ask whether the county attorney of Fayette County is entitled to be compensated as a district attorney.
Section 24.254 of the Government Code provides that the and 155th Judicial District is composed of Austin, Fayette, 43.160 of the Government Code wailer Counties. Section states the t@voters of Austin and Waller Counties elect a attorney for the 155th Judicial District who district represents the state in that district court only in those counties."
Section 45.175 of the Government Code provides that in "Fayette County the county attorney shall perform the duties imposed on and have the powers conferred on district attorneys by general law."
you direct our attention to section 46.001 of the Government Code that provides county attorneys performing the duties of district attorney are wprosecutors'* under the Sec- Professional Prosecutors Act. See Gov't Code ch. 46. tion 46.003(a) provides that each wprosecutor is entitled to equal to 90 percent of receive from the state compensation the compensation that is provided for a district judge in the General Appropriations Act." Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1254, 5 2, at 5057 (effective September 1, 1989, However, section 46.002 delineates prosecutozz amended). subject to this chapter, which is applicable only to prose- cutors in counties named in this section. Section 46.002(3) lists those county the duties of district attorney in designated counties as coming within the provisions of this chapter. The county attorney of Fayette County is not listed in subsection (3).
Honorable Bob Bullock Page 2 (JM-1264)
Sections 46.001 and 46.002 were both enacted at the same session of the legislature as part of Senate Bill 1228, Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 480, 5 1, at 1969 (effective September 1, 1985). Section 311.026(b) of the Government Code provides that if the conflict between a general provision and a special provision is irreconcilable, the special provision prevails unless the general provision is the later enactment and the manifest intent is that the In the instant case, subsection general provision prevails. (3) of section 46.002 listing county attorneys the duties of district attorneys in designated counties as coming within the act is the special provision. The legislative intent that the provisions of this act
apply only to county attorneys of counties listed in sub- section (3) of section 46.002 is further evidenced by House Bill 600, Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 811, 5 1, at 3676, amending subsection (3) of section 46.002 by adding county attorneys performing the duties of district in three additional counties. Neither the original nor the amended version of 46.002 lists Fayette County. Further- more, even though section 45.175 states that the county attorney of Fayette County has "the powers conferred on district attorneys by general law,l' chapter 46 is the exclusive provision governing the pay of county attorneys who perform the duties of district attorneys. We conclude that the district attorney of Fayette County does not come within the definition of llprosecutorO@ in section 46.001 so as to be entitled to compensation under section 46.003.
The county attorney, of Fayette County is not entitled to be compensated as a prose- cutor under section 46.003 of the Government Code.
JIM MATTOX Attorney General of Texas MARYKRLLRR
First Assistant Attorney General
Honorable Bob Bullock Page 3 (JM-1264)
LOU MCCREARY
Executive Assistant Attorney General
JUDGE ZOUIE STEAKLEY
Special Assistant Attorney General
RENEA HICKS
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Tom G. Davis
Assistant Attorney General
Pm 6757