History
  • No items yet
midpage
Unowsky v. Show
161 Minn. 489
Minn.
1925
Check Treatment

1 Reported in 201 N.W. 936. Judgment was entered against the defendants by default. On their motion it was vacated with leave to answer. The plaintiff appeals. *Page 490

1. Upon the service of the summons the defendants engaged counsel. He prepared answers. Through inadvertence they were placed in his office files and were not served. Promptly upon notice of the entry of judgment this motion was made. There was no substantial prejudice to the plaintiff. The trial court exercised its discretion wisely, if it was properly invoked, in vacating the judgment and permitting a defense. Rodgers v. U.S. D. Ins. Co. 127 Minn. 435, 149 N.W. 671, and cases cited.

2. But it is said that there was no affidavit of merits. The statute requires none. G.S. 1923, § 9283; G.S. 1913, § 7786. The court rule making such requirement may be waived if merits appear from the record as they do here. Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild Co. 145 Minn. 74, 176 N.W. 153; Dunnell, Minn. Dig. § 5020.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Unowsky v. Show
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jan 23, 1925
Citation: 161 Minn. 489
Docket Number: No. 24,381.
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.