*1 Present: AMBRO, CHAGARES and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges
1. Motion by Appellee USA to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04,
2012; and 2. Letter Response by Appellant, Christopher G. Wright, in Opposition to
Motion to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04, 2012.
Respectfully, Clerk/dwb _______________________________ O R D E R ______________________________ The foregoing motion by Appellee to amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 4, 2012 is denied. The letter response construed as a cross-motion by Appellant, Christopher G. Wright in opposition to the motion to amend is granted in part and denied in part. The opinion is amended as follows: on page 10, first full paragraph, lines 6-7, replace “with the intent” with “intending, in exchange for the benefits,”.
By the Court, /s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: February 7, 2012
Appeal Nos. 09-3467, 09-3731 & 09-3965
USA v. Christopher Wright, Ravinder Chawla and Andrew Teitelman Page 2
DWB/cc:
Jennifer A. Williams, Esq.
Lisa A. Mathewson, Esq.
Michael J. Bresnick, Esq.
Peter Goldberger, Esq.
Ellen C. Brotman, Esq.