observed that if the debt due the United States is entitled to the preference secured by the impost act of 1799 (section 65) to bonds given for the payment of duties, yet such priority was conferred only in case of insolvency proved by the assignment of all the debtor’s property. The language of the act plainly looks to this condition, and no adjudication of the United States courts or state courts has given it a greater extent. [U. S. v. Hooe] 3 Cranch [7 U. S.] 73; [Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co.] 1 Pet. [26 U. S.] 386,
But the evidence, as it now stands, exhibits Ives as a general trustee of Wood’s creditors for the surplus in his hands. The plaintiff, as such creditor, would be entitled to enforce the trust in this form of action. [U. S. v. Howland] 4 Wheat. [17 U. S.] 108, and note 118. The bill can, therefore, be retained for that object, and the suit be prosecuted to the appropriate decree. Order accordingly.
