United States v. Warren
108 F.3d 332
5th Cir.
1997
Check Treatment

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RANDY DALE WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-10592

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

January 20, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

Summary Calendar; Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; USDC No. 3:91-CR-339-P

PER CURIAM:*

Randy Dale Warren appeals the district court’s decision to revoke his supervised release and his sentence. Warren contends that the district court denied him the right to confront and cross-examine an adverse witness at his revocation hearing.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Warren’s supervised release.

, cert. denied,
. The record supports the district court’s implicit finding that good cause existed to admit the evidence without allowing Warren the opportunity to confront and cross-examine the witness.
, cert. denied,
. Any error in the district court’s evidentiary ruling was harmless.
.

AFFIRMED.

Notes

*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.