*1 Case 4:22-cr-00162-ALM-BD Document 446 Filed 05/15/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
4247
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §
§
v. § Case No. 4:22-cr-162
§ Judge Mazzant EDWARD WALSH VAUGHAN (1) §
HADI AKKAD (2) §
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Defendants ’ Renewal of Motion for Mistrial Based on Constructive Amendment of the First Superseding Indictment (Dkt. #445). Having considered the Motion, the relevant pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED .
On May 15, 2025, Defendants filed a Renewed Motion for Mistrial based on the same arguments raised during the first trial of this case (Dkt. #355; Dkt. #445). Defendants present no new arguments in this Motion and rely on the same arguments raised in their prior Motion ( Compare Dkt. #355, with Dkt. #445). The Court finds the instant Motion should be denied for the reasons articulated in its prior Order (Dkt. #364).
It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants ’ Renewal of Motion for Mistrial Based on Constructive Amendment of the First Superseding Indictment (Dkt. #445) is hereby DENIED .
IT IS SO ORDERED.