History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Vantine
166 F. 751
2d Cir.
1908
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We agree with Jüdge Martin in the conclusion that these Japanese ornamental garden lanterns are completed manufactured articles, brought here in separate "pieces merely for convenience of shipment. They are made out of granite, hewn or dressed, but have passed out of the class of building or monumental stone into a class which is not covered by any paragraph of the tariff act, and should be classified under section 6 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, 30 Stat. 205 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1693]) at 20 per cent, as unenumerated manufactured articles.

Decision affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Vantine
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Nov 16, 1908
Citation: 166 F. 751
Docket Number: No. 54 (4,889)
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.