History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. United States Lines Co. The William J. Riddle. The American Farmer
200 F.2d 608
2d Cir.
1952
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This appeal raises solely questions of fact. The appellant contends that when the vessels sighted each other their headings were such as to call for a starboard to starboard passing. The court discredited the witnesses of the appellant and believed those of the appellee who said the lights were red to red. We cannot say the trial court’s findings of fact on this issue are clearly erroneous. His opinion is reported in The William J. Riddle, 102 F.Supp. 884. It discusses all of the contentions now renewed on the appeal. Nothing is to be gained by a repetition of the discussion. The only possible doubt is whether the American Farmer’s statutory fault in failing to signal when she turned five degrees to her right is enough to fasten contributory fault upon her. Judge Kaufman found that it could not have contributed to the collision. We think he was right. See National Bulk Carriers v. *609 United States, 2 Cir., 183 F.2d 405, 409, certiorari denied Burns S. S. Co. v. National Bulk Carries, 340 U.S. 865, 71 S.Ct. 89, 95 L.Ed. 681. The decree is affirmed on the opinion below.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. United States Lines Co. The William J. Riddle. The American Farmer
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Dec 19, 1952
Citation: 200 F.2d 608
Docket Number: 95, Docket 22482
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.