History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Tunstall
2012 CAAF LEXIS 921
C.A.A.F.
2012
Check Treatment
Docket

CCA 37592. Review granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER APPELLANT’S CONVICTION FOR INDECENT ACTS MUST BE SET ASIDE BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN INSTRUCTING THE JURY THAT INDECENT ACTS IS A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT.
II. WHETHER THE FINDING OF GUILTY TO ADULTERY MUST BE DISMISSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 907(b)(1) BECAUSE IT FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Tunstall
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Date Published: Aug 8, 2012
Citation: 2012 CAAF LEXIS 921
Docket Number: No. 12-0516/AF
Court Abbreviation: C.A.A.F.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In