History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Tipton
19 C.M.A. 483
United States Court of Militar...
1970
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Tipton pleaded guilty to absence without leave that began April 17, 1969, and to five bad check offenses, all committed in May 1969. The dates of the offenses were such that admission of aggravating evidence in the form of Article 15 punishment revealing other instances of unauthorized absence was erroneous. United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970). Considering the offenses charged, the character of the inadmissible evidence, and the fact that the appellant did not "eceive the maximum punishment imposable, even though tried by special court-martial, we do not believe that the accused was prejudiced by the erroneous revelation of the Article 15 punishment. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.





Dissenting Opinion

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Johnson, 19 USCMA 464, 42 CMR 66 (1970).

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Tipton
Court Name: United States Court of Military Appeals
Date Published: Jun 5, 1970
Citation: 19 C.M.A. 483
Docket Number: No. 22,763
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.