History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Thissel
2:24-cr-00138
W.D. Wash.
May 16, 2025
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 2:24-cr-00138-LK Document 61 Filed 05/16/25 Page 1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 2:24-cr-00138-LK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DKT. 59 KEVIN THISSEL, Defendant.

Defendants Kevin Thissel and Christophe Johnson are charged by grand jury indictment with Racketeering, and Conspiracy to Commit RICO with a special sentencing factor. Dkt. 1. On November 15, 2024, the Court issued an order setting trial for October 6, 2025. Dkt. 45. On April 8, 2025, Peter Mazzone was appointed to represent Mr. Thissel; Mr. Fricke was appointed as associate counsel on April 17, 2025. Dkt. 52.

On May 14, 2025, defense counsel Peter Mazzone and Wayne Fricke filed a motion to withdraw as Defendant Kevin Thissel’s lawyer. Dkt. 59. This motion is intertwined with Mr. Thissel’s motion to continue trial to October 2026, (Dkt. 54), which the Court denied on May 5, 2025. See Dkts. 57 and 58.

The Court finds counsels’ motion to withdraw, based largely on time constraints between now and the October 2025 trial date, is premature. The District Judge denied Mr. Thissel’s ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DKT. 59 - 1

*2 Case 2:24-cr-00138-LK Document 61 Filed 05/16/25 Page 2 of 2 1 motion to continue because Mr. Mazzone did not “adequately justify his requested one-year continuance.” Dkt. 57. This indicates defense counsel can renew his motion to extend the trial date with further justification. The District Judge made this clear by directing counsel to explore an agreed continuance, and if an agreement could not be reached to address whether severance is required, whether there are other alternatives, and why, if defense counsel had a conflict with the current trial date when counsel was appointed, counsel nonetheless accepted appointment without determining if the trial date could be delayed. As the assigned District Judge has provided defense counsel with a roadmap to address any time constraints counsel faces caused by the current October 2025 trial date, the Court DENIES the motion to withdraw without prejudice.

DATED this 16th day of May, 2025.

A BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge ORDER DENYING MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DKT. 59 - 2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Thissel
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Washington
Date Published: May 16, 2025
Docket Number: 2:24-cr-00138
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.