United States v. Terry Lee BrownUnited States v. Terry Lee Brown
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellant Brown with two codefendants was indicted for violations of Title
First, appellant contends that the government did not present credible evidence against him. He urges that the testimony of his former girl friend, who testified on behalf of the government, was unworthy of belief. Clearly, this argument is without merit. “It is not for us to weigh the evidence or to determine the credibility of witnesses.” Glasser v. United States,
Finally, error is predicated upon the failure of the district court to sever the appellant’s trial from that of his co-defendants. We find this contention also to be without merit.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.