History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Steveson
9 C.M.A. 332
United States Court of Militar...
1958
Check Treatment

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The accused contends that he was denied due process of law because he was represented by a nonlawyer at the pretrial investigation held pursuant to Article 32, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 832. At the trial, however, he was represented by qualified counsel. The accused interposed no objection to the pretrial investigation and made no request for a continuance for further preparation. It is not alleged, and it nowhere appears, that the accused was prejudiced in any way by the lack of qualification of appointed counsel at the pretrial investigation. The error, therefore, is not prejudicial. United States v Mickel, 9 USCMA 324, 26 CMR 104.

Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Steveson
Court Name: United States Court of Military Appeals
Date Published: Jun 6, 1958
Citation: 9 C.M.A. 332
Docket Number: No. 11,071
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.