Case Information
*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ROCK HILL DIVISION
United States of America, Cr. No. 0:05-1249-CMC
v. William M. Stanley, Opinion and Order
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on Defendant’s pro se motion to reduce his revocation sentence. ECF No. 188. Defendant asks for a sentence reduction or to modify his sentence to home confinement due to health issues.
Title 18 United States Code § 3582(c) limits the court’s authority to modify a final judgment that includes a sentence of imprisonment to three specific circumstances. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The court can modify a judgment (1) upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) for statutorily-specified reasons, including “extraordinary and compelling reasons;” (2) upon motion of the government for substantial assistance; or (3) upon motion of the defendant or the BOP, or upon the court’s own motion, because of a subsequent lowering of the applicable sentencing range. Id. None of these provisions apply to Defendant’s request.
Apart from 18 U.S.C. § 3582, a district court has no jurisdiction to alter a defendant’s term of imprisonment except as authorized by Rule 35(a) or 18 U.S.C. § 3742.
Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits a court to “correct a sentence that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error” within fourteen days after the oral announcement of the sentence. See Rules 35(a) and (c), Fed.R.Crim.P. The revocation sentence was orally announced on November 15, 2016, and, accordingly, the deadline for any action by the *2 court on a Rule 35(a) motion is well past. Therefore, the court is without jurisdiction to act upon Defendant’s motion in this regard.
After an appeal, the court can modify a sentence if the sentence is found by the appellate court to have been imposed in violation of law or imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines, as provided for in 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Defendant did not appeal his revocation or sentence.
The court lacks jurisdiction to reduce Defendant’s sentence, and therefore, Defendant’s motion to modify sentence is denied for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Cameron McGowan Currie CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE Senior United States District Judge Columbia, South Carolina
August 8, 2017
2